SUNDAY, JULY 31, 2016
Workplace.ca HomeWorkplace.ca TrainingWorkplace.ca LawsWorkplace Today Workplace.ca ResourcesWorkplace.ca EventsWorkplace.ca LibraryWorkplace.ca EncyclopediaWorkplace.ca AdvertisingContact Workplace.ca


Workplace.ca is your gateway to Canadian management and workplace resources. It has all the tools you need to create and use successful management and human resources strategies.

Join IPM's Associations Online!

Renew your Membership Online!

Volunteer for IPM Associations








Ask
The Nose Knows
HEALTH REASONS BEHIND SCENT-FREE POLICIES

When you consider that most of us spend 80 to 90 percent of our time indoors, it suddenly becomes relevant to know that indoor air can be two to five times more polluted than outside air. Indoor pollutants, however, are quite different from the classic idea of pollution - clouds of stinky emissions from smoke stacks. For some people, in fact, the worst "pollution" comes from fragrances that are designed to be pleasing to the nose.

Whether it's a lily-of-the-valley fabric softener or an expensive perfume, some people report that they experience asthma attacks and other health symptoms when exposed to scented products. These products are said to trigger any number of symptoms, which may include headaches, dizziness, nausea, fatigue, malaise, insomnia, respiratory problems, anxiety, and others.

An increasing number of workplaces, schools and hospitals in Canada are addressing the issue by implementing scent-free policies. The Kingston General Hospital, for example, recently introduced a hospital-wide ban on fragrances prompted by workers' complaints that their co-workers' perfumes, colognes and other fragrances were causing significant reactive airway problems. One employee in particular ended up in the hospital's emergency ward because of a reaction to scented products.

Should fragrances be considered a health hazard? While the scent-free movement has its opponents - some claim there is no scientific evidence that second hand exposure to scents can affect a person's health - organizations such as the Canadian Lung Association and the Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety (CCOHS) suggest that scent-free policies are a viable option.

CCOHS advises that in workplaces where chemicals in fragrances are suspected of causing health problems, employers should consider a scent-free policy, in addition to other options such as identifying the exact source of the problem and, if possible, reducing all emissions from building materials, cleaning products and other sources of fragrances. CCOHS also stresses the importance of maintaining good indoor air quality (ventilation) to prevent scents from being spread throughout the building.

Another (potentially delicate) way to address the issue, according to scent-free advocates, is to ask the person to wear less of the offending scent or switch to a lighter fragrance. As a guideline for what might constitute too much of a good thing, CCOHS suggests that no scent should be detectable at more than an arm's length from the individual.

Reprinted with the permission of the Canadian Centre for Occupational Health & Safety (CCOHS), 135 Hunter St. East, Hamilton, Ontario L8N 1M5; Tel: (905) 572-2981; Toll free 1-800-668-4284; Fax (905) 572-2206



CPTA




Membership Directory


New and Renewing
Welcome the associations' new and renewing members this month

IPM's National Board
Find out who's who in our associations across Canada

Volunteer for IPM Associations




Message
Quarterly message from IPM's President, Brian Pascal.

Ask the Expert
Expert information on a variety of topics from our members presented in Q&A format.

Spotlight on Members
Find out more about IPM's members.

Chapter Events
News and events from chapters across Canada

Features
Articles of current topical interest.



Members Quarterly Achives



© IPM Management Training and Development Corporation 1984-2016 All Rights Reserved
IPM Management Training and Development Corporation dba IPM- Institute of Professional Management